The Femputers - Comm 403

We were asked to look over an article on CNN.com that discussed why we feel more at ease/prefer female voices in a technological environment.  I think they did an excellent job creating and backing up their points, and I even found interest in some of the comments posted by users.

     I feel like we are more at ease with having females vocalizing our options and choices to us because (as stated in the article) we are used to the sound of an operator being female (an entry level job that many women could easily work in that would not be demanding of them physically.)  To add to this, a lot of the comments presented to this article featured people saying that they would actually prefer to take orders/advice from a female than a male.  This may come from maternal instincts of mothers knowing what is best for you, or it could be a sort of ego boost knowing that a woman is politely giving you information as opposed to a man. 

     In my opinion, I feel that women don't mind receiving instructions for either sex, as they will take direction from both their girlfriends and males without much question.  Men on the other hand tend to be a bit stubborn (just ask any guy to pull over and ask for directions).  Men would much more prefer to hear a kind, gentle woman "suggesting" things to them than be open to another man trying to "tell him what to do".  It all boils down to a minor gender-power struggle that we all face on a daily basis.  Do you prefer male teachers or female teachers?  A male boss or a female boss?  It could be from the voice you prefer to hear to past experiences with both sexes, but either way it's safe to say that the gentle, m ore passive voice heard in most technology has been successful.

By the People, for the People

In class we discussed different methods of persuasion used in political campaigns.  The issue up for debate was the gun control policy, and we were to find a politician and either create an ad for or against them in this cause.  For a positive campaign, sound effects such as applause, cheering, and patriotic, inspirational music are heard.  On the contrary, negative ads were shot in black and white, and used eerie sounding music (in some cases the music heard could have been slightly inspirational or comedic to indicate a satirical opposition for the politician). I've chosen three of my colleagues' video campaign ads to focus on, as they follow this structure and invoke emotions in such a way that would be very successful if they were actually used for a political advertisement.

This first campaign is directed towards Maryland voters in search of a politician that will help with the number of homicides of children in the state.  The ad states that although the rates are the lowest they have ever been, this is not enough because there should not be any children falling victim to these crimes.  A signifier found in this campaign would be the pictures of children fading from color to black and white.  This signifies that these children may no longer be alive, or that they are in danger because of the conditions they are currently living in.  The slow, sad music signifies depression, and a desire for a positive change.  Lastly the message the ad brings "We need our hero back" also signifies a desire for change, as there is no "hero" or leader in charge to take action against this negativity.  This campaign does a great job of using pathos to convey an emotion to the viewer.

This second campaign is also a negative ad towards gun control.  Again, it uses pathos (and logos as well in this case) to convey a strong, convincing message to the viewer about how they should view the gun policy.  The signifier I would like to point out in this ad is the picture of the gun pointed straight at the viewer, literally making them stare down the barrel of a handgun.  This signifies the scariness and fear that comes with the idea of a gun - and when it's staring you in the face, there (should be) no other emotion but fear.  Another signifier would be the other picture used, featuring a man with a gun that looks like he could be crazy and/or unstable.  This also conveys the emotion of fear because we can visualize the type of person using these guns for malicious intent.  The text in this campaign signifies that we don't necessarily need to ban guns, but ban the use of illegal guns that would obviously be used for other reasons other than defense.

This final ad I chose had a very powerful effect on me as a viewer, and definitely would have persuaded me to change my opinion in the election.  It opens with a video of a woman who is a news anchor discussing the amounts of deaths via gun activity that includes the deaths of children in playgrounds.  This signifies that there is a complete lack of care or attention for the safety of the residents in this area.  Not just children, adults as well. The fact that children are becoming victims in these actions indicates that no one is safe - even the absolute innocent.  The dramatic music also creates a tense, and horrifying atmosphere for the viewer by using a song including symphonic elements and foreign chants.  We associate this type of music with rising action of a serious movie where the plot is thickening, and in this case the plot is a little over a minute long so it creates this tense atmosphere throughout the entire ad.  A final signifier for this ad is the clip showing the number of homicides that have taken place this year.  This signifies that even though the rates may have been dropping recently, the amount is still too high to find excusable for any reason. 

-In class discussion-

     A fellow student of mine brought up the topic in class of a blog post found on cracked.com.  The website is known for publishing humorous material, but he found this particular article, Dealing With Bullies You Learned in Movies, a little too real for his tastes.  The author delves into personal experiences with bullying and even bullying that his child received. 

     While I don't doubt that the article may seem a bit on the black humor side, I feel like this was supposed to be a satire.  I have read articles on cracked.com before, and nearly every one of them are funny because they are all drenched in sarcasm.  I personally love this style of humor, so I enjoy most of the blogs I read on there. Although I do feel that this particular piece was darker than the rest (it hit on a way more personal level for the author), knowing that the author was more than likely aiming for a sarcastic approach to this scenario would make me more interested in reading more of his work to see if anything else he has written parallels this. 

     Regardless of his approach, I commend him on going on a different route with this blog, but I can definitely see where Travis is coming from.  If I want to laugh, give me something obvious to laugh at an don't crowd that with a sad story.  I feel as if he was trying to add a bit of realness to this story but it may have not worked in his favor.  Still, he received an emotion out of one of his readers, and when it comes to leaving an impact he did just that.